Family
December: the most famliest month of the year. Every year around this time, Confabulation gets squishy for relatives and hosts the yearly fam jam — a good old-fashioned evening of stories about the people who shaped us.
True stories, now on-line!
Confabulation is Montreal's monthly all-true storytelling showcase. Every show brings together people from all walks of life — doctors, boxers, students, grandmas — to share honest, unscripted accounts without notes, props, or gimmicks. Hosted by actor and comedian Matt Goldberg, each night is a celebration of the personal and political histories that make this city unique.
Shows are held at MainLine Theatre (3997 St-Laurent, Montreal) at 8 PM. Admission is pay what you can.
December: the most famliest month of the year. Every year around this time, Confabulation gets squishy for relatives and hosts the yearly fam jam — a good old-fashioned evening of stories about the people who shaped us.
An evening of stories of remarkable first impressions and surprising results. Montreal's premier monthly all-true storytelling series returned to MainLine Theatre for a night devoted to the best and worst of romantic encounters.
Stories on and off cue, key, and beat — presented as part of the Bouge d'Ici Dance Festival. Confabulation explored the moments when timing is everything, and when it fails spectacularly.
The leaves change and fall, the landlord plays with the heat — Confabulation looked truth square in the face and dared to tell the stories that matter most.
Stories of cures, curses, and confusing the two. Confabulation explored the remedies that backfired, the diagnoses that missed the mark, and the healing that came from unexpected places.
Tales from the highway, the backroads, and the journeys that changed everything. Confabulation hit the road with stories of departure, arrival, and everything in between.
Stories of split-second decisions — the moments when everything hangs in the balance and a single choice changes the course of a life.
2 theatres, 2 hosts, 32 stories, 1 Nuit Blanche. Confabulation's annual Nuit Blanche tradition returned with a marathon of two-minute tales — as many as could be fit into one unforgettable night.
Tales of miscommunication, misunderstanding, and mistaken identity — presented as part of the Bouge d'Ici dance festival. For January, that most confusing of months, Confabulation explored what happens when messages go awry.
A monthly storytelling night needs a theme that feels clear enough to spark memories, yet open enough to welcome people with very different lives. Confabulation works in that space, bringing true, unscripted stories to Montreal audiences through performances hosted by actor and comedian Matt Goldberg. Each event creates a temporary community around a shared idea rather than a fixed script.
The choice of theme is therefore more than a marketing decision. It influences who feels invited to speak, what kind of stories can sit beside one another, and how the audience understands the emotional shape of the evening. A strong subject can hold comedy, vulnerability, awkwardness, cultural difference and sudden change in the same room.
For an Australian audience, the format may feel familiar through live storytelling nights, stand-up, community radio and festivals such as Melbourne Fringe or Brisbane Festival. The difference is the emphasis on personal truth and the unpredictable energy of people telling stories without reading from a polished script. The theme acts as a shared starting point, not a narrow brief.
Confabulation’s approach can be understood as a process of curation, listening and adjustment. The organisers need to consider the city’s mood, the available storytellers, the venue, the rhythm of a monthly series and the kinds of experiences people are willing to share in public. That balance helps each performance feel distinctive while remaining recognisably part of the same ongoing project.
The most effective monthly themes usually begin with an experience many people recognise. Ideas such as first times, family, secrets, work, belonging, risk or getting lost can produce a wide range of memories. They give storytellers a point of entry without telling them what their story must mean.
A theme that is too narrow can make the evening feel like a specialist panel. A theme that is too broad may give performers no useful direction. The sweet spot is a phrase with emotional shape but enough room for contradiction. “Change”, for example, could include migration, a breakup, a new job, a physical transformation, a political shift or the slow realisation that a familiar relationship has altered.
This breadth matters in a city such as Montreal, where language, migration, neighbourhood identity and artistic communities overlap. It also translates well for listeners in Australia. A theme about home might bring out stories of moving between Sydney and regional New South Wales, leaving Perth for Melbourne, returning to a family property, or finding community after arriving from overseas.
The organisers can then test a proposed idea against a simple editorial question: does this subject invite stories, or does it merely describe a topic? A theme should encourage a person to remember a scene, a decision or a moment of tension. It should lead towards lived detail rather than abstract commentary.
Monthly programming benefits from variation. If several consecutive events ask for intense or confessional stories, the series may become emotionally heavy. If every theme leans towards embarrassment and comedy, storytellers with quieter experiences may feel excluded. A season needs changes in pace, tone and emotional temperature.
That means a new theme is considered alongside recent and upcoming events. A reflective night might be followed by something playful. A subject centred on relationships could give way to a theme about work, public life or personal ambition. The sequence creates an arc without requiring the whole season to tell one continuous story.
Timing can also affect the choice. Montreal’s winter encourages different social habits from summer festival season. A theme about travel, neighbours or celebration may land differently in July than in February. The same principle applies to Australian audiences: a story night in the middle of a Melbourne winter, during Sydney’s festival calendar or around the end-of-year holiday period carries its own cultural atmosphere.
Current events may enter the process without taking over. A city experiencing a difficult moment may need a night that offers connection, humour or reflection, but the theme should avoid exploiting public grief. Good curation leaves enough distance for performers to make their own choices about how closely they approach the news.
A theme communicates who is welcome to participate. Words carry assumptions, and organisers need to notice them. A phrase that sounds universal may still privilege one kind of family, relationship or life path. Careful wording can keep the door open to people whose experiences do not fit conventional narratives.
The selection process also involves thinking about the audience’s likely expectations. Confabulation’s pay-what-you-can model lowers a financial barrier and supports a community atmosphere, but accessibility also depends on emotional and cultural signals. People need to understand that a story can be funny, serious, unresolved, bilingual in spirit, or shaped by a background unfamiliar to much of the room.
Digital habits offer a useful comparison. Online audiences often rely on filters to decide what information deserves attention, from payment explanations such as deposit options explained to broader questions about trust and transparency. A live theme works differently, but it performs a similar filtering role: it helps people decide whether an event feels relevant, safe and worth attending.
Editorial focus does not mean imposing a single interpretation. The host may establish the subject and tone, while performers decide what their stories reveal. This distinction protects the unscripted quality of the series. The theme frames the room; it does not predetermine the ending.
A promising idea still has to work aloud. Some concepts look attractive in a planning document but produce stories that are repetitive, too vague or difficult to shape within a live set. The organisers need to imagine how several performers might approach the subject and whether those approaches would contrast with one another.
A useful theme tends to contain a natural dramatic engine. It may involve a choice, a misunderstanding, a discovery, an expectation that went wrong or a change that could not be reversed. This does not mean every story needs a neat lesson. It means the storyteller has somewhere to take the audience.
| Theme quality | What it gives storytellers | What the audience receives |
|---|---|---|
| Familiarity | An immediate personal connection | A clear reason to listen |
| Openness | Room for different backgrounds and perspectives | Variety across the programme |
| Tension | A decision, conflict or uncertainty | Narrative momentum |
| Specificity | A memorable setting, object or moment | Vivid scenes rather than general opinions |
| Flexibility | Permission to be comic, serious or unresolved | A balanced emotional experience |
| Cultural reach | Space for local and international experiences | A wider sense of community |
The venue matters as well. MainLine Theatre is a live room with its own physical relationship between performer and audience. A theme that depends on elaborate visuals, technical explanation or long contextual framing may lose strength there. Stories that can be carried by voice, timing, gesture and imagination are more likely to suit the format.
A stage-ready theme also needs enough performers. If the subject depends on a rare experience, the organisers may struggle to build a varied programme. A broader theme allows the night to include people at different ages and stages of life, while still giving the event a recognisable identity.
Matt Goldberg’s role as host helps shape how a theme is interpreted in the room. Hosting live stories requires more than introducing speakers. The host establishes the pace, acknowledges tonal shifts and helps the audience move from laughter into attention when a story becomes more vulnerable.
The host’s comic sensibility can make difficult material feel approachable, but humour cannot be the only organising principle. A theme needs to support a range of voices, including storytellers who are naturally dry, reflective, theatrical, understated or highly conversational. The strongest nights allow those styles to sit together without forcing every performer into the same performance mode.
Community feedback can provide another signal. Reactions after a show, conversations with returning audience members and the types of pitches performers offer may reveal subjects that have energy. Feedback is most useful when treated as evidence rather than instruction. The loudest request is not automatically the best next theme, and a quiet response may still indicate that a meaningful conversation has begun.
This is where live storytelling differs from a purely data-led entertainment market. Attendance patterns matter, but they cannot measure every valuable outcome. A smaller night may create a powerful sense of recognition, while a popular topic may produce predictable stories. The organisers have to read both the numbers and the room.
The same filtering principle appears in online media, where specialised tools sort a crowded field of options; for example, line filtering methods illustrate how categories can shape attention before a choice is made. Confabulation’s curation is more human and interpretive, since a story may surprise everyone once it is spoken aloud.
Once a theme has been chosen, it must be communicated in language that feels inviting rather than academic. Promotional copy can suggest the emotional territory without explaining every possible story. The aim is to help a potential performer recognise an experience and help a potential audience member picture the evening.
A good description might point towards questions of belonging, risk, memory or change, but it should avoid promising a uniform mood. People attend live storytelling for different reasons. Some want a laugh after work; some are interested in Montreal’s creative community; others want to hear experiences that are absent from their usual social circles.
The Australian context makes this distinction especially relevant. A person arriving after a shift in hospitality in Sydney, a student catching a tram in Melbourne, or a parent attending an arts event in Adelaide may each respond to the same theme in a different way. Local customs, transport, weather and work patterns shape how audiences arrive, settle in and participate.
A monthly series also builds memory through repetition. Regular attendees learn that the theme is a prompt, not a test, and that the programme may move between absurdity and sincerity. Newcomers receive an entry point through the subject, while returning listeners recognise the familiar atmosphere of the series.
The final choice is successful when it creates room for discovery. Organisers can anticipate a theme’s possibilities, yet they cannot fully predict the stories that will emerge. That uncertainty is central to the form. The monthly subject gives the night a centre, while the people onstage supply its actual meaning.
Confabulation chooses its themes by considering several forces at once: the emotional questions people carry, the diversity of Montreal’s communities, the practical demands of a live programme and the need to keep each month distinct. The process is editorial without becoming rigid. It protects the event’s identity while allowing performers to challenge the assumptions attached to a subject.
For audiences, the result is a series of evenings that feel connected but never interchangeable. A theme can bring together a comic memory from a family kitchen, a story about migration, an awkward workplace incident and a quiet account of personal change. Their differences become part of the event’s meaning.
For storytellers, the theme offers enough structure to begin and enough freedom to remain truthful. They do not need to deliver a perfect moral or represent an entire community. They need a specific experience, a willingness to examine it and the courage to share what happened in their own voice.
For the organisers, the work continues after the theme is announced. They listen for balance, consider who is represented, prepare the room and trust the live encounter. The next concrete step is to choose one broad human question, test it against the last few events, and write a two-sentence description that leaves several kinds of story possible.
From the Summer Love show, Zoe Daniels took the stage to share a story about what happens when the season fades and the real work begins.
From the Inherited Stories show, Joel Fishbane shared a tale spanning four decades of devotion — a story passed down and lived through.
From the Summer Love show, Sage Tyrtle brought a story of warm nights, fleeting romance, and the kind of love that only lasts a season — but stays with you forever.